It's about time I address what I feel needs to be in a review that is written by a regular book reviewer or a writer. For those part time readers who just do the, "Hey, this was good," you can probably ignore this post.
I've seen some very long winded reviews and some very short reviews. Abe Lincoln said it best, and I agree... you cannot please all of the people all of the time. But, here's some tips worth noting.
1. Define your Taste Profile
- I prefer happy endings, so I don't like martyr scenarios. I just don't. That's my preference. I'm likely to knock off a star for that.
- How about the pace? I can read a slow book. For example, Erin Morgenstern's The Night Circus. The book was pretty slow. It was too slow for one of my favorite reviewers, Kara Malinczak. She couldn't even finish it! I, however, loved the book. I felt it was something to be savored.
2. Don't Be Rude
Francois Rude (He's seriously Mr. Rude) |
- You can absolutely be snarky without being disrespectful. There are certain adjectives that reviewers should not use. You know what they are. I don't need to list them. Try to stay away from negative hyperboles, metaphors, and analogies.
- I can already hear the naysayers on this tip. But, I stand firmly behind it. Sometimes the only nice thing you can say is that it did not suit your taste. I once read a book that had obviously not been edited. I was only out $0.99 so I wasn't too bummed. In the review, I stated the fact that it had obviously not been edited (and seriously it hadn't and it was obvious). Then, I went on to give the book compliments. The story itself was really cool, and I ended up giving it 3 stars just because of the plotline and dialogue. The grammar and some of the pacing should have made it 1 star.
- You'd think this was a no brainer. If you want to write a good review, stick to the facts. There are things that different reviewers look for. Plotline, character development, pacing, and general quality of writing. Some people are just in it for the romance or how romantic a certain character is. That's fine. Stick to that.
- Okay, while I realize this is not the job of any reviewer, I think it should still be said. If you have never written something for the public before, you have no idea how devastating it can be to get a bad review. While authors are taught to try and take it in stride (some have obviously missed this lesson), this is still their creation you are talking about. Be respectful of the time and effort they have put into it. If you are an author who thinks that other authors should develop the thick skin you have, get off your high horse. Some people are more sensitive. I'm not expecting coddling here, just some level of respect.
See the "Polite Literature" part? Ha, it does exist. |
So, after reading this blog and Indie Authors: Your Sales Are Your Fault, you probably think I'm taking the reviewers' side. I'm not. I'm a writer and an editor. I'm taking the writers' side. I expect good quality to come from writers... after all, in a way, we all represent each other.
What? No posting pictures of the of the reviewer's book after you've shot it and saying "my wife shot it first" a la Richard Ford?
ReplyDeleteFor some reason, I'm kind of okay with that with authors that I know have sold enough to never have to pick up a pen ever again. And sometimes, that's exactly what I hope happens.
DeleteGood advice! I too have read some books lately, self-pub and trad-pub and there were some serious editing issues. I usually don't leave a review so I don't hurt a fellow writers feelings, but now see that I need to just be tactful! Thanks!
ReplyDeleteThis has not always been my stance, but with the onslaught of the angry or unprepared indie, I feel it's a necessity. Honesty and tact. Yep, yep.
DeleteBecause of some of the reasons you've listed, including poor behaviour, I rarely review indie books. I've copped some flack for that, for 'highlighting' the distinction between traditional and indie authors I don't even believe should be made - the fact is I don't believe it should be made, but I'm also not the one who made it. Indie authors themselves stacked up that wall, proud to declare themselves indie, and I'm entitled to make the decision generally not to review indie books because I don't wish to place myself in the firing line. Occasionally I will write a good review of an indie book that really impressed me.
ReplyDeleteI do review traditional books, and while I may well point out the things I don't like, or where the book fell down, I try to do so in a polite way, while still noting the good points.
It's really sad that it has come to that. I really hope we can find a way to resolve this fear of the indie community's outrage. It has gotten so out of hand, and so many great writers are taking a hit because of it.
Delete